IPAKCHILIK KLASTERLARI UCHUN INVESTITSION BOSHQARUV MODELINI ASOSLASH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21262226Ключевые слова:
ipakchilik klasteri, investitsion boshqaruv, integratsiyalashgan model, investitsiya loyihasi, investitsiya portfeli, ko‘p mezonli baholash, investitsion xavf, qiymat zanjiri, moliyalashtirish manbalari, iqtisodiy samaradorlikАннотация
Maqolada ipakchilik klasterlari uchun investitsion boshqaruv modelini shakllantirish va ilmiy asoslash masalalari
yoritilgan. Tut yetishtirish, urug‘chilik, pilla yetishtirish, qayta ishlash, tayyor ipak mahsulotlari ishlab chiqarish va
eksport bosqichlaridagi investitsiya ehtiyojlarini yagona tizimda boshqarishga qaratilgan integratsiyalashgan yondashuv
taklif etilgan. Investitsiya loyihalarini iqtisodiy samaradorlik, texnologik ahamiyat, ijtimoiy natija, eksport salohiyati, ekologik
samaradorlik va xavf mezonlari asosida baholash mexanizmi ishlab chiqilgan
Библиографические ссылки
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2026-yil 16-fevraldagi “Mamlakat taraqqiyotining 2030-yilgacha moʻljallangan
ustuvor yoʻnalishlari doirasida islohotlarni izchil davom ettirish va yangi bosqichga olib chiqishning qoʻshimcha choratadbirlari
toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-21-son Farmoni // URL: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-8050769
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2019-yil 25-dekabrdagi “Investitsiyalar va investitsiya faoliyati toʻgʻrisida”gi O‘RQ-
-son Qonuni // URL: https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-4664142
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 31-iyuldagi “Pillachilik tarmogʻida chuqur qayta ishlashni rivojlantirish
boʻyicha qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida”gi PQ-4411-son qarori // URL: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-4456800
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2024-yil 3-maydagi “Pilla yetishtirish va ipakchilik sohasida bozor
mexanizmlarini joriy qilishni jadallashtirish boʻyicha qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-72-son Farmoni //
URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-6913537
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2026-yil 6-martdagi “Ipakchilik sohasini yangi tizim asosida rivojlantirish
hamda ozuqa bazasini mustahkamlashga doir qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida”gi PQ-87-son qarori // URL:
https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-8076435
Baptista R., Swann P. Do firms in clusters innovate more? // Research Policy. – 1998. – Vol. 27, No. 5. – P. 525–540.
– DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1.
Bell G.G. Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness // Strategic Management Journal. - 2005. – Vol. 26, No. 3. - P.
–295. – DOI: 10.1002/smj.448.
Menzel M.-P., Fornahl D. Cluster life cycles – dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution // Industrial and Corporate
Change. – 2010. – Vol. 19, No. 1. – P. 205–238. - DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtp036.
Cooke P. Regional innovation systems: general findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters // The
Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2002. – Vol. 27, No. 1. – P. 133–145. – DOI: 10.1023/A:1013160923450.
Delgado M., Porter M.E., Stern S. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance // Research Policy. – 2014.- Vol.
, No. 10. – P. 1785–1799. – DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007.
Lehmann E.E., Menter M. Public cluster policy and performance // The Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2018. – Vol.
, No. 3. – P. 558–592. – DOI: 10.1007/s10961-017-9626-4.
Turkina E., Oreshkin B., Kali R. Regional innovation clusters and firm innovation performance: an interactionist
approach // Regional Studies. – 2019. – Vol. 53, No. 8. – P. 1193–1206. – DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566697.
Chen X., Wang E., Miao C., Ji L., Pan S. Industrial clusters as drivers of sustainable regional economic development?
An analysis of an automotive cluster from the perspective of firms’ role // Sustainability. – 2020. – Vol. 12, No. 7. – Art.
– DOI: 10.3390/su12072848.
Ketels C., Protsiv S. Cluster presence and economic performance: a new look based on European data // Regional
Studies. – 2021. – Vol. 55, No. 2. – P. 208–220. – DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1792435.
Lupova-Henry E., Blili S., Dal Zotto C. Clusters as institutional entrepreneurs: lessons from Russia // Journal of
Innovation and Entrepreneurship. – 2021. – Vol. 10. – Art. 7. – P. 1–27. – DOI: 10.1186/s13731-021-00149-5.
Wilson J., Wise E., Smith M. Evidencing the benefits of cluster policies: towards a generalised framework of effects //
Policy Sciences. – 2022. – Vol. 55, No. 2. – P. 369–391. – DOI: 10.1007/s11077-022-09460-8.
Moradvandi A., Ramírez Ramírez A. Portfolio optimization for industrial cluster defossilization in the Port of Rotterdam
// Scientific Reports. – 2026. – Vol. 16. – Art. 5470. – DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-34990-z.
Grześkowiak J., Łochyńska M., Frankowski J. Sericulture in terms of sustainable development in agriculture // Problemy
Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development. – 2022. – Vol. 17, No. 2. – P. 210–217. – DOI: 10.35784/
pe.2022.2.23.
Hassan R., Acerbi F., Terzi S., Rosa P. Transitioning the silk industry towards circularity: a thematic analysis of
sustainable value chain practices // Sustainable Production and Consumption. – 2025. – Vol. 56. – P. 94–111. – DOI:
1016/j.spc.2025.03.009.
Lu F., An M., Liang Q. The sustainability of China’s silk trade: analysis of growth effect and the influencing factors //
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. – 2025. – Vol. 9. – Art. 1521229. – DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1521229.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MUHANDISLIK VA IQTISODIYOT
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.