RESEARCH AND DESIGN OF ANAEROBIC REACTORS FOR EFFECTIVE FERMENTATION OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE

RESEARCH AND DESIGN OF ANAEROBIC REACTORS FOR EFFECTIVE FERMENTATION OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE

Авторы

  • Dilbar Ramazonova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21883911

Ключевые слова:

halophyte raw materials, methanogenic bacteria, methane, biomethane, salsola, suaeda, climacoptera

Аннотация

This article presents the results of research into the development of efficient anaerobic digesters for processing
dense agricultural residues, with a focus on halophytic plant biomass. It is demonstrated that optimizing the reactor design
and process conditions can significantly increase biogas yields when processing mineral-rich plant substrates. Experiments
have shown that processing halophytic plants (Karelinia caspia, Atriplex nitens, Glycyrrhiza glabra, and Suaeda
paradoxa) under mesophilic conditions (35°C) results in a biogas yield of 350 ml per 1 g of dry substrate mass over 25
days. Microbial community analysis revealed the optimal ratio of methanogenic bacteria: 45-50% of the total methanogens
are Methanosarcina, 30-35% are Methanosaeta, and 15-20% are Metanomicrobium. The developed technology
ensures anaerobic digester productivity of 15-20 m³ of biogas per 1 m³ of reactor volume per day with a methane content
of over 55%, guaranteeing a positive energy balance for the process. Microbial community analysis revealed the optimal
ratio of methanogenic bacteria: 45-50% of the total methanogens are Methanosarcina, 30-35% are Methanosaeta, and
15-20% are Metanomicrobium. The developed technology ensures anaerobic digester productivity of 15-20 m³ of biogas
per 1 m³ of reactor volume per day with a methane content of over 55%, guaranteeing a positive energy balance for the
process

Биография автора

Dilbar Ramazonova

Independent researcher of Karshi State Technical University

Библиографические ссылки

Angelidaki, I., & Ahring, B. K. (1993). Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia.

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 38(4), 560-564.

Karki, R., Forgács, G., Sárvári Horváth, I., & Sanati, M. (2021). Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass:

Challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 320, 124369.

Schilling, J., & Borchert, M. (2019). Halophytes as a potential feedstock for biogas production in saline environments.

Biomass and Bioenergy, 124, 45-53.

Zamir, S., & Shavit, U. (2020). Mineral composition and osmotic regulation in extreme halophytes. Plant, Cell &

Environment, 43(8), 1912-1925.

Ferry, J. G. (1999). Enzymology of one-carbon metabolism in methanogenic pathways. FEMS Microbiology Reviews,

(1), 13-38.

Thauer, R. K. (1998). Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson. Microbiology, 144(9), 2377-

Whitman, W. B., Bowen, T. L., & Boone, D. R. (2006). The methanogenic archaea. The Prokaryotes, 3, 684-716.

Askarova, M. K., & Tursunov, S. (2018). Phytomass assessment and biochemical properties of wild halophytes in the

Aral Sea basin. Uzbek Biological Journal, 4, 18-24.

Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M. S., & Astals, S. (2014). A review of co-digestion of agricultural wastes:

Applications and perspectives. Bioresource Technology, 166, 560-572.

Demirel, B., & Scherer, P. (2008). The roles of trace elements during anaerobic digestion of organic wastes. Process

Biochemistry, 43(8), 745-754.

Ward, A. J., Hobbs, P. J., Holliman, P. J., & Jones, D. L. (2008). Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural

resources. Bioresource Technology, 99(17), 7928-7940.

Siegert, I., & Banks, C. (2005). The effect of volatile fatty acids on methanogenic cultures during anaerobic digestion.

Water Science and Technology, 52(1-2), 67-74.

Chen, Y., Cheng, J. J., & Creamer, K. S. (2008). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource

Technology, 99(10), 4044-4064.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2026-08-01
Loading...