HUDUDIY IXTISOSLASHUVNING SHAKLLANISH OMILLARI VA MINTAQAVIY RIVOJLANISHDAGI AHAMIYATI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20798120Ключевые слова:
hududiy ixtisoslashuv, mintaqaviy rivojlanish, Buxoro viloyati, suv resurslari, klaster, aqlli ixtisoslashuv, infratuzilma, institutsional boshqaruvАннотация
Maqolada hududiy ixtisoslashuvning shakllanish omillari, ularning o‘zaro ta’sir mexanizmlari va mintaqaviy
rivojlanishdagi strategik ahamiyati Buxoro viloyati misolida tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqotda tabiiy-resurs salohiyati,
iqtisodiy-geografik joylashuv, mehnat resurslari, infratuzilma va logistika, bozorlarga yaqinlik, investitsiya muhiti, klasterlashuv
darajasi hamda institutsional boshqaruv hududiy ixtisoslashuvning asosiy determinantlari sifatida asoslandi.
Cheklangan suv resurslari sharoitida an’anaviy qishloq xo‘jaligi ixtisoslashuvini suv tejovchi tarmoqlar, turizm, eksportbop
sanoat, raqamli xizmatlar va innovatsion klasterlar bilan uyg‘unlashtirish zarurligi ko‘rsatib berildi. Natijalarga ko‘ra,
Buxoro viloyatida samarali ixtisoslashuv strategiyasi resurslardan oqilona foydalanish, bandlikni oshirish, eksport salohiyatini
kuchaytirish va ekologik barqarorlikni ta’minlashning muhim sharti hisoblanadi.
Библиографические ссылки
FAO. The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW 2021).
Rome: FAO, 2021.
World Bank. Uzbekistan: Country Economic Update – Water Scarcity and Regional Specialization.
Washington, D.C., 2023.
UNDP. Human Development Report: Central Asia Water-Energy Nexus. New York, 2022.
OECD. Regions and Innovation: Collaborating across Borders. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.
Krugman P., Fujita M. The new economic geography: Past, present and the future // Papers in Regional
Science. 2004. Vol. 83, No. 1. P. 139–164.
Porter M.E. Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy //
Economic Development Quarterly. 2000. Vol. 14, No. 1. P. 15–34.
McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to European Union
cohesion policy // Regional Studies. 2015. Vol. 49, No. 8. P. 1291–1302.
Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment // Regional Studies. 2005. Vol. 39, No. 1.
P. 61–74.
Frenken K., Van Oort F., Verburg T. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth //
Regional Studies. 2007. Vol. 41, No. 5. P. 685–697.
Foray D. Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy. London:
Routledge, 2015.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New
York: Crown Publishing, 2012.
Rodríguez-Pose A. The revenge of the places that don’t matter // Cambridge Journal of Regions,
Economy and Society. 2018. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 189–209.
Capello R. Regional Economics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2016.
Soliyev A.S. Mintaqaviy iqtisodiyot: darslik. Toshkent: Universitet, 2014.
Xamidov O.X. Mintaqa iqtisodiyotini boshqarishning institutsional mexanizmlari. Buxoro: Durdona,
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 10-iyuldagi “Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi suv xoʻjaligini
rivojlantirishning 2020 — 2030-yillarga moʻljallangan konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-6024-son
Farmoni // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-4892953
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MUHANDISLIK VA IQTISODIYOT
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.