MICROSOFT ACCESS ASOSIDAGI QAROR QABUL QILISH TIZIMI ORQALI LABORATORIYALARDA “ISO 9001:2015” VA “ISO/IEC 17025:2017” STANDARTLARINI JORIY ETILISH DARAJASINI BAHOLASH.

MICROSOFT ACCESS ASOSIDAGI QAROR QABUL QILISH TIZIMI ORQALI LABORATORIYALARDA “ISO 9001:2015” VA “ISO/IEC 17025:2017” STANDARTLARINI JORIY ETILISH DARAJASINI BAHOLASH.

Авторы

  • Abduvoxid Mamajonov
  • Obidjon Abdujabborov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19306859

Ключевые слова:

ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 17025:2017, laboratoriya, “Microsoft Access”, qaror qabul qilish tizimi, ichki tekshiruv, SWOT tahlili (kuchli va zaif tomonlar), sifatni boshqarish tizimi, laboratoriya sifat menejmenti tizimi (LSMT), CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action — to‘g‘rilovchi va oldini oluvchi harakatlar).

Аннотация

Ushbu maqolada ISO 9001:2015 va ISO/IEC 17025:2017 xalqaro standartlari talablarining laboratoriya
sharoitida joriy etilish darajasini baholash uchun “Microsoft Access” dasturi asosida yaratilgan qaror qabul qilish tizimini
ishlab chiqish masalasi yoritilgan. Taklif etilgan tizim ISO 9001:2015 va ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standartlari bandlarini
laboratoriya faoliyatiga mos ko‘rsatkichlarga ajratish, har bir ko‘rsatkich bo‘yicha 0–10 ballik baholashni amalga oshirish,
dalillarni qayd etish, bo‘limlar kesimida o‘rtacha ball va ularga mos foizlarni hisoblash hamda past baholangan bandlarni
avtomatik aniqlash imkonini beradi. Shuningdek, past baholangan bandlar bo‘yicha tizim kuchli va zaif tomonlar,
imkoniyatlar va xavf-xatarlarni ajratib ko‘rsatadigan tahlilni amalga oshiradi hamda mas’ul shaxs va bajarilish muddati
ko‘rsatilgan takomillashtirish rejalarini shakllantirishga yordam beradi

Биографии авторов

Abduvoxid Mamajonov

Andijon davlat texnika instituti, dotsent

Obidjon Abdujabborov

Andijon davlat texnika instituti, PhD tayanch doktoranti



Библиографические ссылки

International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 — Quality management systems —

Requirements. ISO.

International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General requirements for the

competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO.

Al-Shraideh, M. S., Al-Wedyan, H. O., Al-Ajlouni, A. M., & Al-Abdallat, Y. A. (2021). An approach for benchmarking

service excellence in accredited laboratories using quality management models. Ain Shams Engineering Journal,

(4), 3951–3963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.03.067

Advisera. (2019-07-11). ISO 17025 vs ISO 9001: Main differences and similarities. https://advisera.com/17025academy/

blog/2019/07/11/iso-17025-vs-iso-9001-main-differences-and-similarities/

Lundegårdh, G., & Holen, J. (2015). Integrating ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 in testing laboratories. Accreditation

and Quality Assurance, 20(5), 391–398.

van der Bijl, J. J., & Broek, J. (2017). Risk-based thinking in ISO 9001:2015 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Quality

Engineering, 29(4), 690–702.

Akyar, I. (2014). Quality in laboratory testing. Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 33(4), 347–354.

Lima-Oliveira, G., Lippi, G., Salvagno, G. L., Montagnana, M., & Plebani, M. (2012). Laboratory diagnostics and

quality of the pre-analytical phase. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 342–351.

Plebani, M. (2012). Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. Clinical Biochemistry, 45(12),

–1037.

Pillai, S. P., & Fox, E. (2025). Laboratory quality management system fundamentals. Frontiers in Bioengineering and

Biotechnology, 13, 1578654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1578654

Plebani, M., & Laposata, M. (2020). Decision support systems in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and

Laboratory Medicine, 58(7), 1045–1054.

4CPL. (n.d.). How integrating ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 drives scalable laboratory growth. https://www.4cpl.com/

blog/how-integrating-iso-9001-and-iso-iec-17025-drives-scalable-laboratory-growth/

Carmona-Cejudo, J. M., Hortas, M. L., Baena-García, M., Lana-Linati, J., González, C., Redondo, M., & Morales-

Bueno, R. (2012). DB4US: A decision support system for laboratory information management. Interactive Journal of

Medical Research, 1(2), e16. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2126

Vaitkaitienė, R., Činčikaitė, R., & Janušaitė, V. (2022). Consolidation of the quality indicator system for clinical

laboratories. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 396, 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09041-3_4

Alam, J. M. (2023). Quality in clinical laboratory III: Gap and SWOT analyses as tools for total testing process

improvement. Chemistry Research Journal, 8(5), 16–20.

Kim, Y., Lee, J., & Park, H. (2022). SWOT analysis and expert assessment of the effectiveness of the healthcare

information system in Korea. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 55(5), 427–438. https://doi.

org/10.3961/jpmph.22.360

Kang, J. T., & Kim, H.-J. (2023). QHFSS DNA laboratory — ISO/IEC 17025 conformance and implications for ISO/IEC

Forensic Science International: Synergy, 7, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100288

Загрузки

Опубликован

2026-03-01
Loading...