YO‘L-TRANSPORT HODISALARI SODIR BO‘LISHIDA HAYDOVCHINING PSIXOFIZIOLOGIK HOLATINING TA’SIRI

YO‘L-TRANSPORT HODISALARI SODIR BO‘LISHIDA HAYDOVCHINING PSIXOFIZIOLOGIK HOLATINING TA’SIRI

Authors

  • Sardorjon Ulkanov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21719803

Keywords:

yo‘l-transport hodisasi, haydovchi, psixofiziologik holat, diqqat, reaksiya vaqti, charchoq, stress, harakat xavfsizligi, ADAS, monotonlik.

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada yo‘l-transport hodisalari (YTH) sodir etilishida haydovchining psixofiziologik holatining
ta’siri, uning reaksiya tezligi, diqqat konsentratsiyasi, charchoq, stress, emotsional beqarorlik hamda spirtli ichimlik va
dori vositalarining haydovchilik mahoratiga ta’siri tahlil qilingan. Avtomobilni boshqarish jarayonida haydovchi organizmida
kechadigan psixofiziologik jarayonlar va ularning harakat xavfsizligiga ta’siri statistik ma’lumotlar hamda xalqaro tadqiqotlar
asosida o‘rganilgan. YTHlarning oldini olishda haydovchilarning psixofiziologik tayyorgarligini baholash, monitoring
qilish va zamonaviy intellektual texnologiyalardan (masalan, charchoqni aniqlash va ADAS tizimlari) foydalanish bo‘yicha
samarali taklif va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan.

Author Biography

Sardorjon Ulkanov

Andijon davlat texnika instituti
“Transport logistikasi” kafedrasi dotsenti, PhD

References

Williamson A., Lombardi D. A., Folkard S., Stutts J., Courtney A. H., Connor J. L. The link between fatigue and safety

// Accident Analysis & Prevention. – 2011. – Vol. 43, No. 2. – P. 498–515.

Bulygin A. S. Psychophysiology of the Driver: Stress, Temperament, and Road Safety. – Moscow: Transport, 2019. – P.

–82.

Zhao C., Zhao M., Liu Y., Zheng J. Real-time driver fatigue detection based on EEG and ECG signals // IEEE

Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. – 2021. – Vol. 22, No. 7. – P. 4355–4366.

Donges J. H. A two-level model of driver steering behavior // Human Factors. – 1978. – Vol. 20, No. 6. – P. 691–707.

Lal S. J., Craig A. A critical review of the psychophysiological indicators of driver fatigue // Biological Psychology. –

– Vol. 55, No. 3. – P. 173–194.

Healey J. A., Picard R. W. Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors // IEEE

Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. – 2005. – Vol. 6, No. 2. – P. 156–166.

Lajunen T., Parker D., Stradling S. G. Dimensions of driver anger, aggressiveness, and driving behavior // Transportation

Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. – 1998. – Vol. 1, No. 2. – P. 107–121.

De Waard B. M. The Measurement of Drivers’ Mental Workload. – Haren: The Netherlands Center for Environmental

and Traffic Psychology, University of Groningen, 1996. – P. 23–45.

Sullman M. J. M. Aggressive driving in New Zealand: Factor structure, age, sex, and mileage differences // Personality

and Individual Differences. – 2006. – Vol. 40, No. 3. – P. 499–510.

Dahlen E. J., White R. P. The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and angry driving // Personality and Individual

Differences. – 2006. – Vol. 41, No. 2. – P. 339–347.

Strayer D. L., Drews F. A. Cell-phone-induced driver distraction // Current Directions in Psychological Science. – 2007.

– Vol. 16, No. 3. – P. 128–131.

Recarte M. A., Nunes L. M. Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, physiological measures, and

performance // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. – 2003. – Vol. 9, No. 2. – P. 119–137.

Liang Y., Lee J. D. A hybrid Bayesian network approach to detect driver cognitive distraction // Transportation Research

Part C: Emerging Technologies. – 2014. – Vol. 38. – P. 146–155.

Jonah B. A. Sensation seeking and risky driving: A review // Accident Analysis & Prevention. – 1997. – Vol. 29, No.

– P. 651–665.

Horrey W. J., Wickens C. D. Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques

// Human Factors. – 2006. – Vol. 48, No. 1. – P. 196–205.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01
Loading...