AEROKOSMIK TASVIRLARNI DASTLABKI QAYTA IŞLAŞ VA TASNIFLAŞ USULLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24081819Abstract
Maqolada ösimlik qoplamini monitoring qilişda qöllaniladigan aerokosmik tasvirlarni dastlabki qayta işlaş (radiometrik kalibrlaş, geometrik tuzatiş, tasvir sifatini yaxşilaş, ösimlik indekslari) va tasniflaş (nazoratli va nazoratsiz) usullari tahlil qilingan. Parallelepipedlar, minimal masofa, maksimal ehtimollik va ISODATA usullari qöllaniş şartlari, afzalliklari va çeklovlari böyiça qiyoslangan, Landsat 8 tasvirlari uçun kalibrlaş formulalari keltirilgan. Şarh asosida tasniflaşning kombinatsiyalangan sxemasi va uning aniqligini baholaş tartibi asoslangan. Maqolada mazkur usullarni ekologik monitoringda qöllaş istiqbollari ham yoritilgan. Kalit sözlar: masofaviy zondlaş, aerokosmik tasvirlar, radiometrik kalibrlaş, tasniflaş, ösimlik monitoringi, Landsat 8.Keywords
masofaviy zondlaş, aerokosmik tasvirlar, radiometrik kalibrlaş, tasniflaş, ösimlik monitoringi, Landsat 8.References
Сеитназаров, К. К., Турдышов, Д. Х., Туремуратова, Б. К., & Мухиятдинов, Н. С. (2023). Обзор методов получения космических изображений с высоким разрешением. Ilim hám jámiyet (Наука и общество), (3).
Roy, D. P., Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., … Zhu, Z. (2014). Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sensing of Environment, 145, 154–172. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.001
U.S. Geological Survey. Using the USGS Landsat Level-1 data product. https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/usingusgs-landsat-level-1-data-product
Chander, G., Markham, B. L., & Helder, D. L. (2009). Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(5), 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rse.2009.01.007
Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P., & Macomber, S. A. (2001). Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 75(2), 230–244. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00169-3
Vanonckelen, S., Lhermitte, S., & Van Rompaey, A. (2013). The effect of atmospheric and topographic correction methods on land cover classification accuracy. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 24, 9–21.
Kauth, R. J., & Thomas, G. S. (1976). The tasselled cap — a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. LARS Symposia, Paper 159. Purdue University. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lars_ symp/159
Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017). Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: A review of developments and applications. Journal of Sensors, 2017, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1353691
Jaksibaev, R., Gabbarov, S., Abdurahmanov, I., Sultashova, O., & Khafizova, Z. (2023). Vegetation monitoring in the South Aral Sea region by remote sensing and GIS. E3S Web of Conferences, 386, 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/ e3sconf/202338601001
Löw, F., Prishchepov, A. V., Waldner, F., Dubovyk, O., Akramkhanov, A., Biradar, C., & Lamers, J. P. A. (2018). Mapping cropland abandonment in the Aral Sea Basin with MODIS time series. Remote Sensing, 10(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs10020159
Ball, G. H., & Hall, D. J. (1965). ISODATA, a novel method of data analysis and pattern classification (Technical report). Stanford Research Institute. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/AD0699616/index.html
Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011
Maxwell, A. E., Warner, T. A., & Fang, F. (2018). Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: An applied review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(9), 2784–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.143
Talukdar, S., Singha, P., Mahato, S., Shahfahad, Pal, S., Liou, Y.-A., & Rahman, A. (2020). Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—A review. Remote Sensing, 12(7), 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs12071135
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017). Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5(4), 8–36. https://doi. org/10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307
Erdanaev, E., Kappas, M., & Wyss, D. (2022). The identification of irrigated crop types using support vector machine, random forest and maximum likelihood classification methods with Sentinel-2 data in 2018: Tashkent Province, Uzbekistan. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 18(2), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v18i2.2151
Erdanaev, E., Kappas, M., & Wyss, D. (2022). Irrigated crop types mapping in Tashkent Province of Uzbekistan with remote sensing-based classification methods. Sensors, 22(15), 5683. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155683
Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MUHANDISLIK VA IQTISODIYOT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
