BIBLIOGRAFIK AXBOROT TIZIMLARIDA MA’LUMOTLAR SIFATI: ANIQLIK, TO‘LIQLIK VA ISHONCHLILIK MUAMMOLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23136721Abstract
Bibliografik axborot tizimlarida ma’lumotlar sifati aniqlik, to‘liqlik va ishonchlilik mezonlari asosida tahlil qilinadi. Elektron kataloglar, institutsional repozitoriylar, yig‘ma kataloglar va raqamli kutubxonalarda metama’lumotlar sifatining axborot resurslarini izlash va topish samaradorligi, ularni aniq identifikatsiya qilish, tizimlararo ma’lumot almashinuvi hamda foydalanuvchilar ishonchini ta’minlashdagi ahamiyati yoritiladi. Bibliografik yozuvlarning aniqligi va to‘liqligi, muallif hamda boshqa identifikatsion ma’lumotlarni standartlashtirish, shuningdek, tizimlararo interoperabellikni ta’minlash ma’lumotlar sifatini oshirishning muhim omillari sifatida asoslanadi.Keywords
bibliografik axborot, metama’lumotlar sifati, aniqlik, to‘liqlik, ishonchlilik, elektron katalog, institutsional repozitoriy, avtoritet nazorati, interoperabellik, sifat auditiReferences
Berdiyeva, Z. Bibliografiya (Umumiy bibliografiya): o‘quv qo‘llanma / Z. Berdiyeva, H. Mamatraimova, T. Zokirova. – 4-nashr. – Toshkent: O‘qituvchi NMIU, 2017. – 208 b.
Bruce, T. R. The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting / T. R. Bruce, D. I. Hillmann. (2004). Metadata in Practice / ed. by D. I. Hillmann, E. L. Westbrooks, 238–256.
Park, J.-R. Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art / J.-R. Park. (2009). Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240
Скарук, Г. А. Электронный каталог как объект оценки качества / Г. А. Скарук. (2018). Библиосфера, (2), 85–92.
Ochoa, X. Automatic Evaluation of Metadata Quality in Digital Libraries / X. Ochoa, E. Duval. (2009). International Journal on Digital Libraries, 10(2), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-009-0054-4
Osman, R. Metadata Matters: Evaluating the Quality of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Descriptions in Malaysian Institutional Repositories / R. Osman, A. M. K. Yanti Idaya, A. Abrizah. (2023). Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 28(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol28no1.7
Karimov, U. U. Integrallashgan axborot-kutubxona tizimlarini yaratish modellari, usullari va algoritmlari: texnika fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati / U. U. Karimov. – Toshkent: Toshkent axborot texnologiyalari universiteti, 2020. – 48 b. – URL: https://api.ziyonet.uz/uploads/books/639331/5e424b0ddc594.pdf.
Park, J.-R. Metadata Quality Control in Digital Repositories and Collections: Criteria, Semantics, and Mechanisms / J.-R. Park, Y. Tosaka. (2010). Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(8), 696–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2010.508711
Калинина, Г. П. Библиографическая запись. Основные правила составления: учебное пособие / Г. П. Калинина. – М.: МИПК, 2010. – 202 с. – ISBN 978-5-901087-29-9.
Aydın Çolak, F. Challenges in Ensuring Metadata Quality in Institutional Academic Repositories: A Qualitative Study in Turkish Research Universities / F. Aydın Çolak, Ş. Eroğlu. (2025). The Electronic Library, 43(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-10-2024-0322
Aydın Çolak, F. Evaluating Metadata Quality in Institutional Academic Repositories of Turkish Research Universities / F. Aydın Çolak, Ş. Eroğlu. (2025). Online Information Review, 49(7), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1108/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MUHANDISLIK VA IQTISODIYOT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
