THE ROLE OF NATIONAL MENTALITY AND VALUES IN INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19441090Ключевые слова:
institutional transformation, national mentality, values, informal institutions, governance, socio-cultural factorsАннотация
Institutional transformation processes are becoming increasingly complex and require consideration not only of
formal mechanisms but also of deeply rooted socio-cultural factors. This study analyzes the role of national mentality and
value systems in institutional transformation processes. It examines how informal institutions, including cultural norms,
traditions, and social perceptions, influence the effectiveness, acceptance, and sustainability of reforms. The research is
conducted using a mixed methodology based on theoretical analysis and comparative evaluation. The findings indicate
that alignment between formal institutions and national values enhances policy implementation efficiency, strengthens
institutional trust, and ensures long-term development. Conversely, neglecting cultural factors leads to resistance,
inefficiency, and institutional mismatch.
Библиографические ссылки
D.C. North. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
– 152 p.
Geert Hofstede. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across
Nations. – Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2001. – 596 p.
Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede, Michael Minkov. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. – New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2010. – 576 p.
Ronald Inglehart, Christian Welzel. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. – Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2005. – 344 p.
Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis, Barry R. Weingast. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for
Interpreting Recorded Human History. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. – 326 p.
Ozodjon Sharipjonovich Uralov. Internationalization of Higher Education in Uzbekistan. – Social Sciences & Humanities
Open, 2020. – 10 p. // https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100015
S. Nazarova. The Role of Online Libraries in Advancing the Study of Uzbek Culture. – T.: Tashkent State University of
Oriental Studies, 2024. – 8 p.
R.G. Qodirova. Formation and Transformation of Uzbek National Culture in the Years of Independence. – Shokh
International Journal, 2025. – 12 p. URL: https://www.wosjournals.com/index.php/shokh/article/download/7210/7586
Philippe d’Iribarne. Managing Across Cultures. – London: Routledge, 2009. – 224 p.
Kiril Dimitrov. Geert Hofstede et al’s Set of National Cultural Dimensions: Popularity and Criticisms. – Economic
Alternatives, 2014. – 30–60 p.
Brendan McSweeney. Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith
– A Failure of Analysis. – Human Relations, 2002. – Vol. 55(1). – 89–118 p.
Vladimír Holý, Tomáš Evan. The Role of a Nation’s Culture in the Country’s Governance: Stochastic Frontier Analysis.
– 2021. – 20 p.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MUHANDISLIK VA IQTISODIYOT
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.